pitch.gigs.care

gigs.care

Your RN license earns on your terms.

Get paid to review and sign off nursing work — from your phone, on your schedule. The chart is prepared; you bring the licensed judgment. Early access; this deck says exactly what exists today.

↓ scroll · arrow keys

The only overtime an RN license offers is more floor time

You hold a live RN license — bedside, home-health, or case management — and every existing way to earn more from it is the same answer wearing different scrubs: pick up another shift, join a per-diem agency roster, take a second job. All of them buy your presence. None of them buys the thing the license actually reserves: your nursing judgment.

What keeps that judgment idle between shifts is not demand — home health, utilization review, and care management run on exactly the acts your license stands behind. It is the overhead stack:

An RN license should earn on your terms, not only your unit's.

Postednursecompact.com/

Multistate practice is real, filed machinery, not a promise: the Nurse Licensure Compact gives nurses who live in a compact state a multistate license recognized across the compact's member jurisdictions. Here the state lattice is designed to be computed per review — designed so a review never surfaces from a state you cannot sign in.

Three steps, none of them a shift

  1. Apply. Your RN license — state or compact — and your states, captured in a short application; a CCM or ACM if you hold one. At onboarding your credential will be verified against the official state-board roster, before any first review. No essays, no interviews, no roster to join.
  2. Claim. A matched review reaches your phone: act type, state, and the flat Review Fee, already fixed. Claim it and the AI-prepared chart unlocks — the intake, the history, the draft, the flagged questions. Skip it, and that costs nothing and is invisible to your record.
  3. Sign off — or don't. The reserved acts are the ones your license already stands behind, nothing invented: care-plan review and sign-off, home-health OASIS review, utilization / medical-necessity review, case-management review for CCM/ACM holders. Sign off, send back with a nursing note, or decline. Every outcome is completed professional work; every outcome pays the same flat fee.

How the money works

working Review Fee band and turnaroundPendinggate: first live fee data from routed reviews

What a review pays is your first question, and it deserves a number, not adjectives. The live door posts a $35–120 illustrative target per review at 10–30 minutes of actual work — labeled there, in its own words, "illustrative estimates, not a live-marketplace guarantee." The working Review Fee band posts here the moment real reviews price it — ▮▮▮posts when first live fee data resolves — and until then that band and the minutes target stay exactly what they are: design targets, not measured facts.

Two registers, and this door is the expert one

The gigs.* family runs on two registers that never mix. The expert register — this door — pays for a signature: async queue, per-act fee, deliverable is an approval. The work register pays for presence: shifts dispatched, per-shift rate, deliverable is a completed task. gigs.care recruits sign-off value; its ratified contrast pair, gigs.hospital, is the staged work-register twin that staffs hospital shifts — staged, not live, and never this brand. The same nurse can hold accounts in both registers when the twin ships, but track records never cross the register line: a shift history never inflates a sign-off record, and vice versa.

Inside the healthcare pack, the tribes keep their own doors, drawn by credential: physicians walk through gigs.doctor, the pack lead; APRNs and pharmacists — prescriptive and sign-off authority beyond the RN — through gigs.health; registered nurses through this one. One ICP per door, by rule — this door completes the pack's expert side.

A nurse-practice act names a person — so the motion is B2H2A

B2Abusiness serves an agent — the machine is the customer
B2Dthe developer reads the catalog like API docs — key funnel on the rail
A2Aagent to agent — pure machine commerce
B2A2Ba business system calls the rail on its own behalf
B2A2Dour agent serves the deputized developer
B2A2Cour agent serves the consumer
B2H2Aa statute names a human — the licensed supplier in the pathprimary
A2H2Athe human is a required supplier: the regulated-cell shape

Every gigs.* supply door is B2H2A — business to licensed human to agent — and only B2H2A, because a statute names a person. A care plan needs a nurse's sign-off; an OASIS assessment is nursing work by rule; a medical-necessity review runs on licensed clinical judgment. The H is not a user persona — it is the licensed human whose signature makes the work lawful. On the cell's designed fulfilment path — A2H2A, agent to licensed human to agent — you are the required supplier, which is exactly why the reserved acts stay with you and never with the platform.

Pendinggate: apis.healthcare demand rail designed, built, and live

The demand rail is staged, not live: apis.healthcare is a staged Tier-2 domain in the family map, and no calling system buys acts through it today. Supply is recruited first, candidly — this door exists to have the licensed pool ready when the rail opens, and it says so rather than implying flow that doesn't exist.

The economics, candidly

Human~95% of function cost
Agenticorchestration-priced
Generativeinference-priced
Codenear-zero marginal

Functions migrate Human → Agentic → Generative → Code until they hit their vertical's floor, and nursing sign-off sits on a statutory floor: everything around the signature — intake, history assembly, the chart's first pass, scheduling, invoicing — migrates, and AI keeps getting better at exactly that work. The sign-off itself does not migrate: the nurse-practice act reserves nursing judgment to the license, and a signature that carries professional accountability is priced as judgment, not as hours. That is why this membership exists and why it appreciates as the software improves: the software makes your minutes more productive; it cannot replace the license.

The fee line is a design commitment: the Review Fee is flat and never a share of anything clinical, and the cell's own economics are designed to sit on the demand side of that line — posted per-act rates to the systems that buy the acts, never a cut of the nurse's fee.

Where it stands, stated plainly

Postedgigs.care

The door is live: gigs.care runs the early-access application for founding nurses ("tell us your RN license and states"), labels its target ranges "illustrative estimates, not a live-marketplace guarantee," states the coverage promise in the future tense it belongs in ("we plan to carry the professional liability coverage"), and says plainly it is early access, not a live marketplace yet. The namespace position is occupied.

Postedgigs.doctor

gigs.doctor is live — the healthcare pack lead, the physician tribe's own door, with its own full record in this estate.

Postedgigs.health

gigs.health is live — the companion expert door for NPs and pharmacists, with its own full record in this estate.

The sibling doors are built to one substrate by design — one worker, one Gig envelope, one Register system serving every door. Serving is a liveness fact, not an architecture claim: the URLs above evidence that the doors answer, not the topology behind them.

Pendinggate: professional-liability program bound at the entity, member named as insured

"We plan to carry the professional liability coverage" is the load-bearing promise on the live door, and it is stated as a plan, not a fact. The claim posts when the program is bound and the insured is named. Nothing is signable before then — that is a hard gate, not a preference.

Pendinggate: state-board roster verification running at onboarding, before first review

The live door commits to verifying every credential against the official roster before any work reaches a member — an ordering commitment, stated before any work routes. The claim posts when the roster check runs in production; until then a captured credential is exactly what it is: unverified.

Pendinggate: healthcare cell entity designed, formed, and cleared for its first state

The operating entity is not yet designed — the same stricter candour gigs.health carries, and it holds for this door too. Nursing sign-off sits under fifty state nurse-practice acts, and utilization-review work adds state licensure and accreditation regimes of its own in some jurisdictions; those rules shape what the entity must be, and no membership goes live before that design is done, the entity exists, and its posture is opinion-backed for the first state.

Pendinggate: first routed review signed off and paid end-to-end

There is no live match queue yet, and this deck does not imply one. Early access means exactly that: founding nurses are being onboarded ahead of routing, verification is real before the word "verified" is, and the first routed review flips this claim to posted with the evidence attached — not before.

If nothing changes: the license keeps earning only when a unit schedules it — more floor time as the only overtime — or the uncovered improvisation, which is the risk this platform exists to replace.

If it works: minutes of actual nursing judgment between other things, paid the same day, coverage designed to name you, license and state respected by construction — a credential gone from cost center to productive asset.

The door is gigs.care — it serves today.

Apply for early access at gigs.care. Founding nurses verified before marketplace-live hold first-review priority in their licensed states when routing begins, and the fee schedule is set with the founding cohort, not announced to it. Or read the door first — who carries the coverage, why you can always say no — written to be forwarded to a colleague on the unit before you give a name.